Author: Admin-d2n1a

  • 1995 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting

    Lessons from this meeting:

    Ease of Entry, Power in Staying Power
    Key point: In catastrophe reinsurance anyone can start up, but only deep pockets and staying power win.

    • Small “spray-and-pray” entrants go bust once in ten tries; only a few like Berkshire can underwrite at scale and survive multi-billion-dollar hits.
    • Clients chase carriers they trust to pay claims long after a disaster—capacity without capital strength is a nonstarter.

    Ben Graham’s Yardsticks Apply to Tech Too
    Key point: The same value-investing framework works for high-tech—if you understand the business.

    • Buffett and Munger would insist on the same margin-of-safety and business-like approach, even if volatility and risk look higher.
    • Lack of tech expertise, not flawed principles, keeps them out; a qualified “Bill Gates” applying Graham’s rules could build a tech fund.

    “You Don’t Have to Make It Back the Way You Lost It”
    Key point: Chasing losses in the same form often deepens the hole—investors must pivot to fresh opportunities.

    • Berkshire’s write-down in USAir preferred is acknowledged but won’t drive them back into the same airline sector to recoup it.
    • The first rule of recovering from a bad bet: don’t repeat the mistake; redeploy capital where odds are better, not where you last lost.

    Videotaping Meetings Would Kill the Atmosphere
    Key point: Berkshire values live engagement over mass broadcast—even great ideas aren’t worth empty seats.

    • Management fears videotaping would sap turnout and genuine Q&A energy; a packed hall yields higher-caliber dialogue.
    • Keeping shareholders in the room preserves the rare culture of direct accountability and spontaneous exchange.

    Succession Is Almost a Non-Issue
    Key point: With strong businesses and decentralized leadership, even an “idiot” could keep Berkshire humming.

    • The operating units run autonomously under proven managers; headquarters needs surprisingly little hands-on direction.
    • Capital allocation is the only key skill to replace—an advantage, not a crisis, given their bias toward buying stakes in great firms.

    Options Give Optionality—Preferred to ‘Pay Up Front’
    Key point: Issuing convertible preferred stock is a powerful way to raise capital without immediate dilution or debt strain.

    • Berkshire prefers structures that offer the right, but not the obligation, to turn paper into equity over several years.
    • Having flexibility to choose cash or stock on redemption dates keeps Berkshire ready to pounce on big acquisitions.

    Economic Moat ≈ Scale + Alignment
    Key point: A durable business combines scale advantages with managers whose interests match owners’.

    • Scale—whether buying power, brand recall, or network effects—builds the protective moat around a high-return castle.
    • Low “agency costs” (i.e., honest, owner-oriented managers) ensure castle keepers don’t strip away shareholder value.

    Derivatives: Few, Understandable, Counterparty-Safe
    Key point: Only employ derivatives when they’re the simplest, cost-effective way to achieve a clear hedge—and counterparty risk is nailed down.

    • Buffett insists on two modest-sized derivative programs he fully grasps; sheer novelty or leverage without purpose is off limits.
    • Never enter a paper swap unless you know you’ll collect the payoff—Berkshire underwrites only against rock-solid partners.

    Projections Are Advertising, Not Analysis
    Key point: Forecasts from sellers or advisors almost always reflect bias, not truth—skip the guff and trust organized common sense.

    • Managers who push elaborate five-year models usually want to justify a pre-set deal; real due diligence is far simpler.
    • Buffett once demanded past forecast accuracy alongside new projections—and found the track record laughably poor.

    First Filter: Do You Understand It?
    Key point: No matter how enticing the returns appear, if Buffett and Munger can’t grasp a business quickly, they won’t invest.

    • The very first question is “Can I explain how this company makes money?” If not, move on—complexity is a warning sign.
    • Only once the business model is crystal-clear do they probe economics, competitive position, and future cash-flow potential.

  • 1994 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting

    Lessons from this meeting:

    1. Redefining Risk for the Long Haul
      Key point: True risk isn’t about day-to-day price swings but the chance of a permanent loss over your intended holding period.
      • Buffett argues that flipping a stock in a single day is far riskier than owning a great business for decades.
      • By focusing on businesses with predictable long-term cash flows, Berkshire accepts short-term losses but avoids permanent capital impairment.
    2. Catastrophe Insurance: Waking the Industry
      Key point: One major hurricane or quake can wipe out years of underwriting profits, yet many insurers still underprice true worst-case exposure.
      • A single $15–20 billion event could trigger a $600–700 million hit for Berkshire, dwarfing its annual premiums.
      • Buffett emphasizes pricing policies to catastrophic exposure, not just recent claims history, to avoid surprises.
    3. Why Berkshire Isn’t Just Another Mutual Fund
      Key point: Unlike a traditional fund, Berkshire aims to own entire businesses—and only buys partial stakes when bargains exist.
      • Buffett and Munger see Berkshire as a collection of standalone companies—ideally held 100%—rather than shares in a portfolio manager’s whims.
      • They’d rather buy whole companies (with tax and control benefits), but “the stock market is far more inefficient,” giving Berkshire the chance to pick up pieces of world-class businesses at silly prices.
    4. Walking Away from a Small Thrift
      Key point: When a business unit becomes more burden than boon, Berkshire has no qualms about selling—even a long-held subsidiary.
      • After S&L scandals prompted heavy new regulation, the tiny Pasadena savings & loan simply didn’t merit the administrative hassle.
      • Buffett and Munger remind investors that “there’s a time to vote with your feet … and even your wallet.”
    5. “Multiply by Three, Not π”
      Key point: Complexity is the enemy of good investing—if you can’t quickly grasp a business’s core economics, pass on it.
      • Buffett and Munger favor simple, proven models over elaborate forecasts and avoid industries outside their circle of competence.
      • Their rule: better to apply a reliable rule of thumb three times correctly than chase precision that depends on unknowns.
    6. When Shoe Chains Shine
      Key point: Outstanding results in a tough industry come down to exceptional managers, not magical materials or trends.
      • Dexter Shoe, H.H. Brown, and Borsheims owe their profitability to people like the Blumkins and Isslers, not unique leather.
      • Recognizing that “talent compounds,” Berkshire looks to expand its shoe operations wherever those leaders can run them.
    7. Utility Gets Voted, Not Invented
      Key point: A product’s real value is shown by consumer behavior—if the market isn’t buying, it isn’t useful.
      • Buffett cites billions of daily Coke servings and decades of sneaker sales as proof that broad demand beats any marketing pitch.
      • He won’t back niche fads or untested concepts—only businesses the public has already validated with its wallets.
    8. Their Off-Wall Street Reading List
      Key point: Beyond balance sheets, Buffett and Munger draw insights from biographies and history to sharpen judgment.
      • Buffett’s favorites include a forthcoming Ben Graham biography and Geoff Cowan’s deep dive into the Clarence Darrow trial.
      • Munger revisits Connie Bruck’s corporate biography and a 1952 Franklin life story—learning timeless lessons from remarkable lives.
    9. Tax Vision: Consumption Over Income
      Key point: To balance reward and responsibility, Buffett would tax spending more heavily than earnings—especially at the high end.
      • He proposes a “steeply progressive” consumption tax so that those who live large contribute proportionally more.
      • While he supports progressivity, he and Munger agree that tax rates shouldn’t stifle productivity or penalize essential workers.
    10. Tobacco: Profitable but Poisoned
      Key point: High margins and cash flows don’t trump societal, legal, and reputational risks—Buffett draws the line at big stakes in tobacco.
    • Despite tobacco’s status as a “huge cash-cow,” he wouldn’t put a significant slice of his own net worth into it.
    • He warns that shifting public attitudes and lawsuits can transform today’s profits into tomorrow’s liabilities.